مطالب مرتبط با کلیدواژه

S


۱.

America and Securitization of Iran after the Islamic revolution 1979 till 2013; continuation or change(مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)

کلیدواژه‌ها: Iran U S Foreign policy Islamic revolution Copenhagen school Securitization

حوزه های تخصصی:
تعداد بازدید : ۹۵۳ تعداد دانلود : ۶۵۳
U.S foreign policy toward Iran had been so uncertain and variable since the beginning of this relation, but alongside fluctuations, some kind of consistency is distinguishable. Until the Islamic revolution of 1979by the Iranian people, Iran was playing a major role in the U.S. anti-communist strategy in the Middle East. U.S grand strategy was based on its confrontation with USSR and Iran was the key for controlling the Middle East and process of underpinning Iran’s power as a liberal ally in the region was at the core of U.S considerations in Iran. After the 1979 revolution, Iran’s priority had changed as a regional actor and it no longer identified itself as a member in the Western coalition based on American foreign policy. On the other hand, U.S. also stopped to identify Iran as a friend and started to demonize the new role Iran was playing in the Middle East and the world. By having these trends in mind, a very fundamental, important question strikes the mind: Did U.S has a turning point in its foreign policy toward Iran after the 1979 or the principle of its foreign policy was fixed and only tactical changes occurred? In order to answer this question I’m going to examine the history of U.S foreign policy toward Iran, particularly the post-revolutionary period. This analysis will be conducted according to the Copenhagen school definition of security and concept of securitization. This theoretical frame work brought us a comprehensive understanding of security and also a relative, useful categorization of security strategy in foreign policy. Different methodological approaches could be used in these frameworks but in this research I have used the discourse analysis method to explore the subject of research. Conclusion of the research shows us that American strategy toward Iran covers both permanent and variable factors but the permanent element was the key and variable factors made changes only in tactical level. U.S foreign policy was basically directed toward securitizing Iran but the world system, regional and national events also made it more powerful. It means that after the Islamic revolution of Iran, U.S. has continuously made an attempt in persuading other actors to securitize Iran. Before the Cold War, this securitization was in a low level but after the Cold War it can be classified as a high-securitization.
۲.

مدل R.S.V.P: فرآیند خلاق سنجش تا عمل در طراحی شهری

کلیدواژه‌ها: v طراحی شهری تحلیل عملکرد S واژگان کلیدی: منابع امتیازات مدل R P

حوزه های تخصصی:
تعداد بازدید : ۷۷۵ تعداد دانلود : ۶۵۵
تعدد منابع، مقیاس و گروه های ذینفع در طول انجام یک طرح، موجبات بروز مدلی جدید تحت عنوان R.S.V.P را فراهم آورد. پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناخت ماهیت، پیشینه و برخی از مهمترین تجارب صورت گرفته، ضرورت پرداخت به این مدل را در ایران متذکر می شود. یافته های نوشتار تأکید دارد که مدل R.S.V.P وامدار هنرهای موسیقی، نمایشی و ترسیمی بوده و قابلیت استفاده در رشته های مشابه همچون طراحی شهری را دارد. در این پژوهش سعی بر این بوده تا مؤلفه های این چرخه به درستی شناسایی شده و تأثیر آن ها بر عملکرد فرآیند بررسی گردد. طبق یافته ها، این مدل جهت شفاف سازی فرایندها به کار گرفته می شود و هر کدام از مؤلفه های چهارگانه، نماد یک بخش از مدل می باشد. این مدل با استفاده از امتیازات (S) سعی در نمایش و تحلیل منابع موجود در محیط (R) دارد. جهت بررسی بازخوردها و تصمیم سازی نهایی از تحلیل عملکرد (V) استفاده می نماید، و محصول نهایی (P)، نشان دهندة مسیر طی شده می باشد.
۳.

The United States National Security Strategy under Bush and Obama: Continuity and Change(مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)

کلیدواژه‌ها: Foreign policy grand strategy international system neoclassical realism U S National Security Strategy

حوزه های تخصصی:
تعداد بازدید : ۴۷۵ تعداد دانلود : ۳۱۷
The foreign policy of states determines the way they behave in the international arena. Accurate analysis of official foreign policy documents of a country is helpful in that it shows what the international priorities of a country are at specific periods. This article reviews the U.S. National Security Strategy documents published in 2002, 2006, 2010 and 2015 from the perspective of the perception of threats to the U.S. security and perception of the U.S. role in the world. It tries to study the differences and similarities between the Bush and Obama administrations in this regard using a Neoclassical Realist framework. The results show that the Obama administration identified a wider range of threat sources to U.S. national security while providing less detailed solutions to them. Also, as democracy promotion abroad ceased to be a priority in 2015, compared to 2002 and 2006, counterterrorism continues to be at the top of U.S. security agenda. In line with Neoclassical Realism, creation of an international order under U.S. leadership is an important priority mentioned in the NSS of 2015.