وابستگی به مسیر و نقش ایدئولوژی عمیق در جدال میان دولت و جامعه بر وقوع انقلاب اسلامی (مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
درجه علمی: نشریه علمی (وزارت علوم)
آرشیو
چکیده
با ورود به دهه پنجم از پیروزی انقلاب اسلامی، بررسی ابعاد گوناگون آن، هنوز هم از دریچه های مختلف قابل تأمل و شگفت انگیز است، به طوری که در پرتو اقدامات شبه مدرنیستیِ رژیم پهلوی دوم، در آنچه که می توان از آن به عنوان مشکله «وابستگی به مسیر» یاد کرد، زمینه های نارضایتی و نیل به سوی تغییر در جدال میان دولت و جامعه فراهم گردید. بدین سان، مقاله حاضر تلاش می کند تا به این سؤال اصلی پاسخگو باشد که کیفیت حکومت داری رژیم پهلوی، چگونه نارضایتی اقشار مختلف مردم را در تلفیق با نوآوری ایدئولوژی امام خمینی و وقوع انقلاب اسلامی ایران فراهم کرده است؟ پژوهش حاضر با تمسّک بر نظریه نسل چهارم انقلاب گلدستون، این نتیجه را احصا نموده است که نوآوری های منبعث از فرهنگ مذهبی- شیعه امام خمینی در قالب «ایدئولوژی عمیق»، مجموعه جایگزین های موجود را به واسطه ولایت فقیه فزونی بخشید و اهداف و راهبرد های اقشار مختلف مردم را در توالی رویدادها در مقاطع حساس و بحرانی به سمت تغییر نظام سیاسی وابسته به مسیر سوق داده بود.The role of “deep ideology” in the conflict of government - society and occurrence of Islamic Revolution in Iran
Entering the fifth decade since the victory of the Islamic Revolution, the examination of its various dimensions is still thought-provoking and surprising from different aspects. So that according to the pseudo-modernism actions of the second Pahlavi regime, in what can be referred to as the problem of path dependence, contexts for dissatisfaction and change were provided in the conflict between the government and society.Thus, the present article tries to answer the main question that how the governance quality of the Pahlavi regime has provided the dissatisfaction of different sections of the people in the integration of the innovation of the ideology of Imam Khomeini and the occurrence of the Iranian Islamic Revolution? The present research, based on the theory of the fourth generation revolution of the Goldstone , has concluded that the innovations emanating from the religious culture of Imam Khomeini's Shia in the form of a deep ideology increased the set of existing alternatives through the Velayat Faqih, and the goals and strategies of different type of the people had been led in the sequence of events at serious and critical moments towards the change of the political system depending on the path.Iran's Islamic Revolution shows the logic of path-dependent reactive sequence reasoning. As far as possible in this path, three main sequences can be identified, which are: modernization, environmental and cultural. The modernization sequence is considered a primary sequence and contains events that directly harmed the interests, values and culture of the society.The environmental sequence has been set up by the inherent characteristics of the Iranian people, such as independence, people's participation in elections, and freedom. These conditions were necessary for the strong reliance of different strata of people on an ideological innovation invented by Imam Khomeini.The cultural sequence has been determined by strengthening the propositions of the invented ideology, such as the priority of the people over the government, Islamic freedom, the necessity of religion's involvement in politics, emphasis on ijtihad according to the requirements of time and place, and finally the Islamic state.