ظرفیت های زبانی ما-راوی: ملاحظات کاربرد ضمیر اوَل شخص جمع در روایتگری (مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
درجه علمی: نشریه علمی (وزارت علوم)
آرشیو
چکیده
داستان هایی که به شیوه ما-روایت بیان می شوند، به اعتبار بهره گیری از ضمیر اول شخص جمع، از ویژگی های منحصربه فردی در ساخت برخوردارند. بافت این داستان ها حاوی مشخصه هایی است که تا پیش از این به صورت مجزا ذیل زاویه دیدهای اول شخص مفرد و سوم شخص قرار می گرفته است. درواقع به نظر می رسد روایتگر جمعی موقعیتی روایی برای تجمیع امکانات تکنیکی هر دو شکل از زوایه دیدهای یادشده است. درهمین راستا این پژوهش در نظر دارد نشان دهد هریک از ابعاد تعریف منطقی ضمیر «ما» در پدید آمدن ظرفیت های خارق العاده روایتگری چگونه عمل می کنند. برای دستیابی به این منظور متونی از داستان های معاصر فارسی گزینش و مرور شد ند. بررسی الگوهای موجود در این داستان ها نشان می دهد گسترش پیرنگ داستان در گرو سه ویژگی «ضمیربودگی» با فرآیند مرجع یابی، «اول شخص بودگی» با مقوله وجه روایی و «جمع بودگی» با افزودن قابلیت تکثر توام با انسجام در شخصیت پردازی است. هریک از موارد یادشده با امکاناتی که در اختیار روایت داستانی قرار می دهند، باعث شکل گیری و پیشروی طرح داستان می گردند. دیگر برآیند مطالعه مطابق روش مذکور، جدا از تشریح عملکرد این ضمیر در نقش راوی، نوعی طبقه بندی قراردادی از داستان هایی است که با این شیوه روایتگری خلق شده اند.‘We’ Narrator Linguistic Potentials: First-person Plural Practicality in Narration
‘We’ narratives possess a unique structure which remarkably differs from narrative structures in stories told through the first-person singular or the third-person points of view. From this perspective, one may consider the plural narrator as the technical sum total of the aforementioned points of view. In line with this claim, this paper aims to discuss the different aspects of the ‘we’ pronoun as the narrator in creating diverse narrative potentials. To reach such a goal, we handpicked and reviewed a number of contemporary Persian stories narrated by ‘we’ pronoun. The analysis of the narrative pattern of these stories proves that the expansion of the plot is affected by the relation between the ‘pronoun’ and the referencing process, ‘singularity’ and the narrative mood concept, and ‘plurality’ and the addition as well cohesion in characterization. Each of these possibilities strengthens narrative organicism and forms and advances the structure of the story. In addition, apart from justifying the selection of ‘we’ pronoun by the narrator, the article offers a conventional categorisation of the stories narrated in such a structure.
Extended Abstract
1.Introduction
Logically, the pronoun ‘we’ is defined as the first-person plural pronoun. This pronoun, when applied by the narrator, provides a point of view known as the ‘we’ narrator/ ‘we’ narrative which because of the nature of the pronoun can trigger doubt, suspense, or ambiguity. The implicit nature of this pronoun might problematise narrator identification so that the reader might need to read the story more carefully than usual to follow the plotline and the referencing process. Furthermore, the plurality of the pronoun increases the risk of misunderstanding. In addition to occasional uses in classical Persian literature, this point of view has been used in a number of contemporary Persian stories which can be studied from different aspects among which is the study of the first-person plural pronoun as the main point of view in the stories.
2.Theoretical Framework
In linguistics, deictic words are studied separately under semantics or pragmatics. However, since a separate explanation of the semantic or pragmatic aspects might not be possible or preferred, an eclectic combination is adopted here to study the applications of ‘we’ pronoun in narration.
3.Methodology
Considering the fact that the article can progress in accordance with the logical definition of ‘we’, this article studies the three notions of the first-person singular, pronoun, and the first-person plural. Also, through an inductive method and in line with the common linguistic terminologies, the article studies the effects of these three domains on the narration process and provides examples of contemporary Persian stories.
4.Discussion and Analysis
The stories which employ the ‘we’ pronoun for narration possess a wide range of narrative tools for expanding the plotline. These tools can be analysed from different perspectives:
Pronoun: The referential capabilities of this word provide different depths to the story. Firstly, ‘we’ is considered a pre-referent pronoun which, in the standard usage, necessitates the presence the referent. If the process works, the explanation of the pronoun will be inductive. On the other hand, the text will be ambiguous if the pronoun is mentioned without the referent and the referent is explained in the texture of the story in accordance with the author’s preferences. In addition, a pronoun can refer to more than one referent and this makes it a perfect tool for the author to create ambiguities. Another aspect is the domain of the ‘we’ narrator which can be inside the story so the narrator and the reader can make a unified ‘we’.
First-person: The pronoun’s referentiality can be decoded through showing or telling. We can classify ‘we’ narrators into internal and external categories. The story introduces the active ‘we’ narrator by showing, but when ‘we’ narrator is outside of the story, the identification domain is limited to the point of view of narration because ‘we’ becomes a spectator and the unveiling process is bound to the understanding of where ‘we’ stands. At this point, the narrator can unveil himself or leave the reader in doubt and uncertainty. In the stories in which ‘we’ narrator is subjective, there would be a surplus of confusion and ambiguity.
First-person plural: Although ‘we’ narrator stories can have multiple narrators, they maintain their unity under ‘we’ pronoun. This happens when the author aims to write a story which is complicated and subjective in nature. The plurality of narration covers the limitations caused by time, space, and the characters’ consciousness.
5.Conclusion
In conclusion, one can assume that the narrative capabilities of ‘we’ narrator reside in the innate characteristics of the first-person pronoun which make it possible to create vastly different stories. This point of view can expand narrative substructure, enhance the rhetorical qualities of the text, and create an ambiguous and paradoxical context. But the most comprehensive and important function of ‘we’ is that it offers the potential of the first-person singular and omniscient narrator in unison and this makes it the perfect tool in innovative modes of storytelling.
Select Bibliography
Bekhta, N. 2017. "We-Narratives: The Distinctiveness of Collective Narration". Narrative . Vol. 25. No. 2. PP. 164-181.
Fludernik, M. 2011. “The Category ‘Person’ in Fiction: You and We Narrative and the Question of Authors and Readers.” Current Trends in Narratology . Greta Olson (ed.). PP. 41-101.
Margolin, U. 1996. “Telling our story: on 'we' literary narratives”. Language and Literature . Vol. 5. No 2. PP. 115-133.
Margolin, U. 2000. ."Telling in the Plural: From Grammar to Ideolog". Poetics Today 21. PP. 591-618.
Palmer, A. 2011."The Mind Beyond the Skin in Little Dorri". Current Trends in Narratology . Greta Olson (ed.). Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
Richardson, B. 2009. “Plural Focalization, Singular Voices: Wandering Perspectives in ‘We’-Narration.” Point of View, Perspective, and Focalization: Modeling Mediation in Narrative . Peter Hühn, Wolf Schmid, and Jörg Schönert (eds.). Berlin: de Gruyter. PP. 143–159.
Richardson, B. 2011. “U.S. Ethnic and Postcolonial Fiction: Toward a Poetics of Collective Narratives”. Analyzing World Fiction . Frederick Luis Aldama (ed.). University of Texas Press. PP. 3-16.