and specifying its sanction system. One of the guarantees of the superior rule's compliance with the executive power's decisions is the parliament speaker’s supervisory authority according to Article 85 & 138 of the Constitution. The constituent parts of the legal hierarchy in our country are the holy Islam, the Constitution, the parliament rules and the governmental decisions respectively. This kind of review is non-judicial and is next to the administrative justice court and is done by a specific commission by reviewing and comparing governmental decisions with superior laws. This review has some differences from other supervision structures in bases, subjects, scope and sanctions and its absence of unity has caused criticism against its legal and logical validity. Through the general rules of the public law, we have analyzed the topic, criterions of evaluation, guarantees and the effects of this review and finally by a pathological analysis and comparison of that with the French legal system we were led to the usefulness of this kind of review of decisions of the executive power in our legal system, but about its form and quality, by noting the defects and present inefficiencies, we reached to the necessity of transforming this kind of supervisory authority from the person-centered form to the structure-based and systematic review.
