army

Revolutions can be analyzed at the level of roots, trends and consequences. "Systematization" is related to the level of the process or stage of transition from the old system to the revolutionary system.This article analyzes Imam Khomeini's political thought and action in the field of military systematization.. The result of processing the article hypothesis is that the Pahlavi military-security structure under the leadership of Imam Khomeini (ra) is a strategy-stimulating and arousing national pride And the feelings of the military; Not to insult or slander them; And encouraged, honored, and emphasized their dignity in a new way On the one hand, the former military foundations remained and the army of the Islamic Republic It was reproduced based on the same Pahlavi army And a military vacuum was prevented for the collapse of the post-Pahlavi regime On the other hand, the management structure of the Iranian army changed slowly That the restoration of the old and pre-revolutionary regime was not possible either The formation of three institutions of the Revolutionary Committee, the Revolutionary Guards and the mobilization of the oppressed was completed.This article has been processed qualitatively and descriptively-analytically The formation of three institutions of the Revolutionary Committee, the Revolutionary Guards and the mobilization of the oppressed was completed.This article has been processed qualitatively and descriptively-analytically.

Following Arab invasions into Iran and their territorial expansion within the Sasanian realm, Iranian discontent with Arab rulers grew, particularly during the Umayyad and Abbasid periods. These grievances sparked uprisings and revolts, eroding Arab control over the eastern reaches of the Islamic Empire and gradually enabling local governments in the east to assert autonomy. Amidst conflicts on its western borders and engagements with the Byzantine Empire, the Abbasid Caliphate grew uneasy as local governments like the Tahirids, Saffarids, and Samanids declared independence, albeit with nominal allegiance to Baghdad. Among these emerging powers, the Samanids of Transoxiana, centered in Bukhara, rose to prominence. Originally prominent commanders within the Abbasid army, the Samanid rulers, with the backing of their people and forces, navigated toward independence. Initially part of the Abbasid army hierarchy and beneficiaries of military training under the Abbasid regime, the Samanid emirs seized the opportunity created by the weakened Caliphate and conflicting interests with Baghdad, establishing a semi-independent government in the east. In this historical context, military forces and militarism held significant importance for all the established systems in the eastern regions, including the Samanids. The military played a pivotal role in shaping and sustaining Iranian local governments like the Samanids.