مطالب مرتبط با کلیدواژه

geometry


۱.

Estimating the distance by Stick Method in a 12th century Arabic manuscript(مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)

نویسنده:
تعداد بازدید : ۲۸۷ تعداد دانلود : ۱۷۱
The stick method is a common and easy way to estimate the object size or its distance to an observer. Today, painters, scouts, artillery observers, woodchoppers, etc. use this method when they have no special rangefinder instrument. We don’t know the exact origin of this method but Euclid has described a similar way in proposition 22 of his optics. Great astronomer of the 12th century, cAbd al-Raḥmān al-Khāzinī, has explained the stick method in his treatise named about the marvelous instruments (fī Ālāt al-cAjība). He dedicated his treatise to explain observatory instruments and amplified how to use these instruments and the information gathered by them. al-Khāzinī described 7 instruments used for observing the stars in 7 independent books and added their application as the surveying tools. He presented the geometrical arguments to show us why and how we can use his formulas to gain mathematical information about subjects from data gathered by these instruments. al-Khāzinī talked about the stick method in an appendix without the geometrical arguments. His main goal was to describe a simple way for soldiers and horsemen to calculate their distance from their enemies or estimate the strength of foes armies. Furthermore, he explained estimating the distance from an object by knowing its diameter or vice versa and finally estimating the distance and diameter of the object when they were both unknown. His method was easy and practical for anyone in the military campaign who didn’t know complicated mathematical relations. He used a wooden stick about 80 c.m long to do this job. In this paper, I briefly presented al-Khāzinī’s original treatise and four manuscripts available in the libraries and talked about how amended al-Khāzinī’s treatise in the first step. Secondly, I introduced the English translation of al-Khāzinī’s appendix about the stick method with its main Arabic text. Finally, I described his method by modern mathematics symbols and notations and then I tried to rebuild the geometrical arguments according to his previous book about the triquetrum.
۲.

The Process of Constructing a Regular Hexagon in the Near East: From Neolithic Pottery to Euclid’s Elements(مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)

کلیدواژه‌ها: Regular Hexagon Near East Neolithic Pottery geometry

حوزه های تخصصی:
تعداد بازدید : ۲۲۰ تعداد دانلود : ۱۶۹
A regular hexagon is one of the shapes introduced in Plane Geometry and refers to a hexagon with equal sides wherein the size of each angle is 120 degrees. This geometric shape, which can be quickly drawn today, was constructed over a long period in the millennia BC In the Late Neolithic period in Mesopotamia, the primary geometric shapes, including triangles, quadrilaterals, arcs, and circles, were additionally painted on the surface of pottery ware. Naturally, these shapes had been initially drawn by hand, and the sides of the polygons were not comprised of straight lines, or the circles had not been drawn perfectly. However, in the Chalcolithic age, geometric shapes moved away from handmade forms and approached standard ones. This standardization was not possible without drawing tools. In the meantime, the role of compasses or other objects with a similar use was of utmost importance because drawing a circle with such tools paved the way for drawing regular polygons. In fact, from the Late Neolithic, handmade triangles and arcs in the Near East, the first regular hexagon in the late second or the early first millennium emerged over several thousand years. Constructing this geometric shape with the help of standard circles and arcs has been well documented in the Near Eastern archaeological evidence. On the other hand, regular hexagons have been attributed to the second half of the first millennium in the history of mathematics. Therefore, this study reflected on the construction process of this geometric shape and dated its drawing hundreds of years back.
۳.

A study on dimensions of Fractal geometry in Iranian architecture(مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)

نویسنده:

کلیدواژه‌ها: geometry fractal geometry Iranian architecture Islamic architecture

حوزه های تخصصی:
تعداد بازدید : ۴۸ تعداد دانلود : ۴۳
The subject of geometry and proportions has been regarded as an issue which has a close relationship with architecture. Since the entire universe, living beings and the human geometry can be seen clearly, that’s why our unconscious essence has accustomed to these proportions whereby reflection of this mentality can be seen in the architect’s hands and thought in the architecture. It can witness a close linkage between nature and architecture at different levels in Iranian architecture which the linkage at architecture geometry has been regarded as one of these levels. Iranian geometry using plant and geometric forms in Islamic buildings seeks to prove a special continuity in the life to plant and human world. This continuity in the world of geometry has been known with fractal geometry. The present research seeks to examine dimensions of fractal geometry in Iranian architecture and motifs. In following, an attempt is made to examine what the fractal means in Iranian architecture and clarify the motifs and decorations of Iranian architecture after defining the issue of fractal, fractal geometry and fractal in architecture.
۴.

On the Architectonic Idea of Mathematics(مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)

نویسنده:

کلیدواژه‌ها: architectonic geometry mathematics Arithmetic construction

حوزه های تخصصی:
تعداد بازدید : ۲۲ تعداد دانلود : ۱۷
The architectonic is key for situating Kant’s understanding of science in the coming century. For Kant the faculty of reason turns to ideas to form a complete system. The coherence of the system rests on these ideas. In contrast to technical unity which can be abstracted a posteriori, architectonic ideas are the source of a priori unity for the system of reason because they connect our reasonable pursuit to essential human ends. Given Kant’s focus on mathematics, in the architectonic and his critical philosophy more generally, we must have some sense of the architectonic idea of mathematics. In this paper, I argue for the key principles of the architectonic idea of mathematics: 1) because mathematics is grounded in a priori intuition, it is a peculiarly human activity; 2) the method of mathematics is one of a priori construction, a method only mathematics can employ and: 3) the objects of mathematics are extensive magnitudes. Given these principles, we can use the architectonic idea to have some clarity about how mathematics has dealt with historical development.