Logit

In this paper we construct a modeling for detection of banks which are experiencing serious problems. Sample and variable set of the study contains 30 banks of Iran during 2006-2014 and their financial ratios. Well known multivariate statistical technique (principal component analysis) was used to explore the basic financial characteristics of the banks, and discriminant Logit and Probit models were estimated based on these characteristics. Results suggest that the model can be used as an analytical decision support tool in both on-site and off-site bank monitoring system to detect the banks which are experiencing serious problems. JEL Classifications: C49, G21, G33

Relying on the Area Under the Curve (AUC) measure, we compare the performance of the Logit regression model and the LightGBM algorithm. Despite these methods being common in the literature, our study emphasizes the role of statistical inference to evaluate and compare the results comprehensively. We use the training set of the Vesta (2018) dataset, provided by Vesta—a global fraud prevention company headquartered in the United States specializing in payment solutions and risk management. Originally released as part of a Kaggle competition focused on credit card fraud detection, this dataset comprises diverse transaction records, representing a rich source for exploring advanced fraud detection methods. Our analysis reveals that while the LightGBM algorithm generally yields higher predictive accuracy, the differences between the calculated AUCs of the two methods are not statistically significant. This underscores the importance of using inferential techniques to validate model performance differences in fraud detection.