روی کرد سیاق محور در تفسیر مواهب الرحمن: تحلیل نوآوری های روش شناختی عبدالاعلی سبزواری (مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
درجه علمی: نشریه علمی (وزارت علوم)
آرشیو
چکیده
مفسران سیاق را به معنای مجموعه قرائنِ درون متنیِ ضمیمه به هریک از آیات قرآن می انگارند و آگاهی از آن را کمابیش برای تفسیر قرآن ضروری می دانند؛ گرچه بعضی از ایشان تفسیر همه آیات با نظر به سیاق را نیز برنمی تابند و در آن تکلفات یا محظوراتی می بینند. در مطالعه کنونی روی کرد سیاق محور سید عبدالأعلی موسوی سبزواری، مفسر معاصر (درگذشته 1414ق/ 1372ش)، در تفسیر مواهب الرحمن بازشناسانده می شود. مؤلفِ این تفسیر ازیک سو همانند بسیاری دیگر از مفسران به سیاق هم چون ابزاری سازنده و پویا برای کشف مراد الهی در فرآیند تفسیر می نگرد که با تکیه بر آن می توان پیوستگی ذهنی و عینی میان واژه ها و مقاصدِ وحی را بازشناخت. ازدیگرسو، برخلاف غالبِ مفسران، وی مفهومی وسیع تر از سیاق اراده کرده، آن را مشتمل بر همه قرائن متنی و برون متنیِ حاکی از معنای آیه شناسانده، شواهد فرهنگی، اجتماعی، سیاسی و تاریخیِ مرتبط با نزولِ هر آیه را هم چون بخشی از سیاق برشمرده، و این گونه، کوشیده است بر محظوراتی که گاه در حمل آیه ای بر سیاق به معنای مُضَیَّقِ آن حاصل می شود غلبه کند. هدف مطالعه کنونی بازشناسی روی کردِ خاصِّ سبزواری به سیاق و راه کارهای او برای تحلیل ساختار معنایی و روابط بینامتنی، رفع تعارضات ظاهری، و تفسیرِ نظام مندِ آیات است. یافته های این مطالعه نشان می دهد که در تفسیر مواهب الرحمن، سیاق ابزاری کارآمد و چندبعدی شناسانده می شود که توجه به آن، نه تنها به فهم دقیق تر معانی و مفاهیم آیات قرآن کمک می کند، مانع تفسیر نادرست نیز می شود.Context as an Interpretive Method: A Study of Sabzawārī's Mawāhib al-Raḥmān
Interpreters of the Qurʾān have traditionally recognized siyāq (context) as a fundamental hermeneutical tool, generally defined as the ensemble of intra-textual indicators surrounding a verse that are essential for its correct exegesis. While its importance is widely acknowledged, a segment of classical and modern exegetes has expressed reservations, cautioning against a rigid, exclusive application of siyāq to all verses, which they argue can lead to artificial interpretations or impose unwarranted constraints on meaning. This study provides a critical examination of the distinctive context-oriented methodology employed by the contemporary Shīʿī scholar, Sayyid ʿAbd al-Aʿlā Mūsawī Sabzawārī, in his voluminous exegesis, Mawāhib al-Raḥmān. It argues that Sabzawārī not only champions siyāq as a central interpretive principle but also radically expands its conventional scope, transforming it from a primarily linguistic aid into the foundational pillar of his entire exegetical system. This study delineates a dual approach in Sabzawārī's work. On one hand, he aligns with mainstream exegetical tradition by treating siyāq as a dynamic and constructive mechanism for discerning divine intent. He leverages it to reveal the conceptual and objective coherence (munāsabah) between words, verses, and the overarching objectives of revelation. On the other hand, and this constitutes his primary innovation, Sabzawārī departs from the majority by advocating for a significantly broader conception of siyāq. For him, it is not confined to the immediate verbal environment but encompasses all textual and extra-textual indicators that can illuminate a verse's meaning. This inclusive definition integrates cultural, social, political, and historical evidence pertaining to the circumstances of revelation (asbāb al-nuzūl) as integral components of siyāq. This methodological expansion is consciously deployed to overcome the limitations and potential artificiality he identifies in narrower, purely linguistic applications of context. Operating within the framework of Islamic, and more specifically, Shīʿī theological and hermeneutical principles, Sabzawārī's application of siyāq is both meticulous and systematic. The study meticulously catalogues the diverse functions of siyāq in Mawāhib al-Raḥmān, which can be categorized across two primary levels of operation. At the micro-analytical level (sentence and phrase), siyāq is employed to: determine the precise semantic value of words; differentiate between near-synonyms, expand or restrict lexical meanings based on the surrounding discourse, identify the correct referents of pronouns, elucidate subtle rhetorical devices such as emphasis (taʾkīd) and specificity (ḥaṣr), and ultimately, ascertain the primary intended meaning of a verse. This granular application serves to prevent misinterpretation and provides Sabzawārī with a robust, text-based criterion for critically evaluating and often refuting the opinions of other exegetes. At the macro-analytical level (text and sūra), siyāq evolves into a powerful tool for establishing the Qurʾān's structural and thematic coherence. Sabzawārī utilizes it to: reconstruct profound semantic links between seemingly disconnected verses, resolve apparent contradictions between different Quranic passages, explain complex pronominal references across verses, analyze the rhetorical architecture of larger passages, and demonstrate the intricate thematic unity within and across sūras. This higher-order application allows him to present a holistic, problem-oriented, and systematic interpretive model that treats the Qurʾān as an integrated whole. In conclusion, the findings of this study demonstrate that Mawāhib al-Raḥmān offers a paradigm for the systematic and hierarchical application of siyāq. Sabzawārī’s methodology successfully integrates lexical analysis, semantic coherence, rhetorical examination, and intertextual reading into a unified exegetical framework. His work, therefore, represents a significant advancement in Quranic hermeneutics, effectively elevating siyāq from its conventional status as a supplementary literary clue to that of a central, indispensable, and sophisticated methodological principle. As such, Mawāhib al-Raḥmān stands as a pioneering work in intra-textual and intertextual analysis, providing a valuable and stimulating model for future research in Quranic interpretive methodology and critical exegetical studies.
تبلیغات
