مولوی و کازنتزاکیس در ترازوی اندیشه و احساس با تاکید بر ساحت های نفسانی درونی (باورها، احساسات و خواسته ها) (مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
درجه علمی: نشریه علمی (وزارت علوم)
آرشیو
چکیده
بررسی و تحلیلِ تقابل/ تعامل/ تضاربِ اندیشه متفکران و صاحبان تجربه هنری موضوعی است که در مجموعه ساحت هایِ پژوهش های ادبی می تواند بستر و زمینه ساز درک بهتر گفتمانِ فکریِ صاحبان متون - با وجود همه تفاوت های فرهنگی - تلقی شود. در این بستر مولوی و کازنتزاکیس، دو متفکر بزرگ جهان اسلام و مسیحیت هستند که آثار آنها از منظرهای مختلف و در حالت مقایسه ای و با انگیزه های گوناگون قابل تامل است. یکی از مهم ترین این انگیزه ها، نوع اندیشه در باورمندی به ساحت های نفسانی به ویژه ساحت باورها و اعتقادات، احساسات و عواطف، خواسته ها و نیازها است که این مقاله بدان پرداخته است. نویسنده در این مقاله با روش تحلیلی- انتقادی مهم ترین عناصر مشترکِ فکری این دو متفکر را با تاکید بر پنج ویژگی شخصیتی مشترک از یک سو و بارزترین عناصر و مولفه های فکری، عواطف و خواسته های مشترک از سویی دیگر واکاوی و تحلیل کرده است. دستاورد این پژوهش نشان می دهد با وجود همه نگره های غیرهمسو، هر دو بر اصلِ رسیدن به سعادت و شادکامیِ مستمرِ پایان ناپذیر اهتمام ورزیده اند و با توجه به ذوابعاد دیدن انسان بر ساحت نفسانی در قالب نسخه ها و دستورالعمل های مختلف توجه کرده اند.Mewlana and Kazantzakis in the thought and feeling scale emphasis on the internal selfish field (the Beliefs, Felling, Desires)
The review and analysis of confrontation/ interaction of thinkers thought and the artistic experience owners is subject that in set of literary researches can be considered –in spite of cultural differs - underlie of better understanding of discourse thinking of authors. Mewlana and Kazantzakis in this ground are two important thinkers of Islam and Christianity world that can be analyzed their texts in various aspects by attitude of comparative. One of the most important attitude, was thought variety in the selfish field especially beliefs, feelings and emotions, desires ground that present article analyze and scrutinize this problem. Writer in this article analyzed the most significant common elements of texts mewlana and Kazantzakis emphasis on character natures on one hand and the most obvious thoughts, emotions, desires elements on the other hand by analytical- critical method. The results of this research shows in spite of uncommon attitude, both of them figure on principle of endless prosperity and happiness and pay attention to selfish ground by life prescriptions by regard to different dimensions. Key words: Literature psychology- comparative literature- selfish grounds- Mewlana and Kazantzakis Introduction From the perspective of intertextual conversational logic, texts play an undeniable role in developing the reader's understanding of a subject. And how often a single topic in the second and third texts could be more effective in developing the reader's understanding than the first text. Therefore, in the comparative study of two great texts, it is possible to review points of similarity and difference of the two text-creator from various aspects. The first three selfish fields, that is, beliefs, feelings and emotions, desires and needs were among the most important areas of investigation that can be considered in intertextual relationships. The central subject of this article is to discover and analyze the comparative aspects of the opinion of two great thinkers of Islam and Christianity world, Mevlevî and Kazantzakis, that self-love on the one hand and loving all beings on the other hand have repeatedly appeared in their intellectual systems. Anyway, first, in a general view, focusing on the meaning of life, the common features of Mevlevî and Kazantzakis have been considered, and then, regarding to the first three field of selfish, the intellectual system of them has been analyzed in multiple axes. Literature review With regard to the lack of written research in this field and based on the observation and accuracy, no research was found with the present approach. Of course, in examining the aspects of comparing Mevlevî's thought with other thinkers, numerous and various researches have been carried out, and each of them from a specific point of view has paid attention to the conflict and interaction of Mevlevî's thought with other thinkers and has shown the similarities and differences. Here is some of the most important: 1. Mevlevî and Emerson (Hossein Shajareh, Yaghma, no. 7, ser. 11, 1958) 2. Mevlevî, Surrealism, Rimbaud and Freud (Reza Baraheni, Faculty of Literature, Tabriz University, no. 2, ser. 17, 1955) 3. Tolstoy, Mevlevî of the new era (Mohammad Ali Islami Nodooshan, Yaghma, no. 1 and 2, ser. 27, 1974) 4. Images of Movement in Rumi and Whitman's Poems (Gholam Mohammad Faez, Ketabepazh, no. 5, 1992) 5. Examining the Idea of Excellence in the Opinion of Rumi and Jaspers (Jameeleh Alam Al-Hoda, Nameh Farhang, no. 23, ser. 6, 1996) 6. Mevlevî and Blake Are Two Sympathizers (Sohila Salahi Moghadam, Faculty of Humanities, Al-Zahra University, no. 26-7, ser. 8, 1998). Dissuasion and Conclusion Examining the intellectual system of thinkers in the logic of conversational texts is a part of cultural and literary deliberations, which apart from discovering the intellectual roots of schools, people and nations, is effective and useful in reaching to a kind of intercultural understanding and conflicts. With regard t
تبلیغات
