ارزیابی پیامدهای نظام برنامه ریزی روستایی کشور در استان خراسان شمالی (مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
درجه علمی: نشریه علمی (وزارت علوم)
آرشیو
چکیده
این تحقیق بر اساس متغیرهای؛ نارسایی ها، عوامل محیطی و ناحیه ای، توجه و تاکید بر تصمیم گیری و عمل غیر متمرکز، توجه کمتر به جایگاه روستا و سیاستگذاری برنامه ریزی توسعه روستایی در دوره قبل و بعد از انقلاب اسلامی و نیز برنامه ریزی فرابخشی به جای بخشی نگری انجام شد و جامعه آماری نمونه آن دربرگیرنده 127 نفر به روش دلفی بوده است. ابزار پژوهش مصاحبه و پرسشنامه محقق ساخته بوده که روایی، پایایی(روش ضریب آلفای کرونباخ) و نرمال بودن داده ها(آزمون کلموگروف اسمیرونوف) به کمک روش های آماری مورد تایید قرار گرفتند. در نهایت، جهت آزمون فرضیه های تحقیق از آزمونt تک نمونه ای به کمک نرم افزار SPSS آماری استفاده گردید. نتایج تحقیق نشان داد که در پنج فرضیه بر اساس تجزیه و تحلیل آماری استخراج شده از پرسشنامه ها؛ نتایج تخمین، سطح معناداری متغیرهای نارسایی، عوامل محلی و ناحیه ای، توجه و تاکید بر تصمیم گیری و عمل غیر متمرکز، توجه کمتر به جایگاه روستا و سیاستگذاری برنامه ریزی توسعه روستایی در دوره قبل و بعد از انقلاب اسلامی و نیز برنامه ریزی فرابخشی به جای بخشی نگری در ارتباط با متغیر مدل نظام سیاست گذاری برنامه ریزی توسعه روستایی ایران کمتر از 0/05 می باشد، بنابراین در سطح اطمینان 95 درصد رابطه این متغیرها معنادار است. همچنین مقدار آماره t برای پنج فرضیه به ترتیب 649/36- ، 826/33-، 571/27-، 694/30- و 384/28- بدست آمد. طی فرآیند تحقیق ثابت شد که نظام سیاست گذاری برنامه ریزی توسعه روستایی در کشور دارای مشکلات، نارسایی ها و چالش هایی است. همچنین برنامه ریزی متمرکز امکان و مجال استفاده از ظرفیت های محلی و ناحیه ای را برای سیاست گذاران و برنامه ریزان توسعه نمی دهد و این مساله خود موجب دور ماندن روستا و مناطق روستایی از توسعه می گردد. تمرکززدایی در برنامه ریزی توسعه روستایی کشور باید به عنوان یک اصل محترم شمرده شده و به عنوان یک ضرورت تلقی گردد.Evaluating the consequences of the country's Rural Planning system in North Khorasan Province
Extended Abstract Introduction One of the dimensions of rural development is the management of sustainable rural development at the local and macro level, sustainable rural development is the process of all-round improvement of rural life through the establishment and encouragement of activities compatible with the capabilities and bottlenecks of the environment. Therefore, structural grounding in environmental-ecological, social-cultural, economic, institutional-management and physical-spatial aspects can lead to the proper functioning of this process. In turn, sustainable rural development is realized with the participation of villagers in decision-making, implementation, sharing of benefits and monitoring and evaluation. Diversity is the basis of stability and stability, and the more diverse a system becomes, the more its stability and dynamism is maintained over time and in different places against internal and external tensions. Today, diversifying the rural economy is one of the approaches to realizing sustainable rural development. In a research, they designed a model of rural development planning and policy challenges in Iran based on a data-based theory. The participants in the research consisted of experts in the field of rural planning and development, of which 28 people were selected based on the theoretical saturation criterion and using the purposeful sampling approach and the snowball sampling method. Methodology The current research is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-analytical in terms of nature and method. The method of collecting information was in the form of documentation and field observation, interview and completing a questionnaire. The statistical population of this research is academic experts in the field of rural development, provincial planners in the country's rural and municipal organizations, provincial planners in the Ministry of Jihad and Agriculture, and provincial planners in the Ministry of Industries, Program and Budget Organization, and others. Results and Discussion The estimation results, the significance level of the failure variables in relation to the model variable of Iran's rural development planning policy system is less than 0.05, so the relationship between these two variables is significant at the 95% confidence level. Also, according to the value of t-statistic equal to -36.649, which is greater than 1.96, the first hypothesis of the research is confirmed. In other words, during the research process, it was proved that the policy-making system of rural development planning in the country has problems, inadequacies and challenges. According to the estimation results, the significance level of the variables of local and regional factors in relation to the model variable of the policy system of rural development planning of Iran is less than 0.05, so at the 95% confidence level, the relationship between these two variables is significant. Is. Also, according to the value of t-statistic, it is equal to -33.826, which is greater than 1.96, as a result, the second hypothesis of the research is confirmed. Basically, centralized planning does not allow policymakers and planners to use local and regional capacities, and this issue itself will keep villages and rural areas away from development. Therefore, during the research process, it was proved that according to the prevailing approach of centralized planning in Iran, local and regional factors play a lesser role in rural development planning policymaking. The results of the model estimation showed that the significance level of the variables of attention and emphasis on decentralized decision-making and action in relation to the variable of the Iranian rural development planning policy system model is less than 0.05, so at the confidence level of 95% The relationship between these two variables is significant. Also, according to the value of t-statistic, it is equal to -27.571, which is greater than 1.96, as a result, the third hypothesis of the research is confirmed. What is important in this connection is that the results prove that decentralization in the country's rural development planning should be respected as a principle and considered as a necessity. In other words, during the research process, it was proved that in the country's rural development planning policy, attention and emphasis on decentralized decision-making and action is necessary. Based on the estimation results, the significance level of the variables of less attention to the position of the village and rural development planning policy in the period before and after the revolution in relation to the variable of Iran's rural development planning policy system model variable is less than 0.05. , therefore, at the 95% confidence level, the relationship between these two variables is significant. Also, according to the value of t-statistic, it is equal to -30.694, which is greater than 1.96, as a result, the fourth hypothesis of the research is confirmed. Document review shows; In all the programs that have been implemented from the past until now, the village and rural development have been on the sidelines and their place in the planning has not been satisfactory and appropriate. In other words, during the research process, it was proven that in the development programs before and after the Islamic revolution, the role of the village and the policy making of rural development planning were less considered. According to the output of the estimation results, the significance level of trans-sectoral planning variables instead of sectoral in relation to the variable of Iran's rural development planning policy system model is less than 0.05, so at the 95% confidence level, the relationship These two variables are significant. According to the value of t-statistic equal to -28.384, which is greater than 1.96, the fifth hypothesis of the research is confirmed. In other words, during the research process, it was proved that trans sectoral planning is necessary instead of sectoral planning at different levels in rural development planning. Conclusion The policies and plans of construction and development are indicative of the fact that in the country's rural development planning, attention and emphasis has been focused on decision-making and action from top to bottom. One of the main results obtained in this research is that in our country, due to the multiplicity of executive centers in the field of rural development, we are witnessing the fragmentation and lack of coherence of the organization. Therefore, the existence of a level that can aggregate these issues is very important. In fact, it acts as an executive and effective support in decision-making and implementation of rural development policies and has a trans-sectoral role. Therefore, according to the records and experiences of rural development planning in the country during the last few decades and taking into account the possibilities, bottlenecks and challenges in the development process of rural areas, as well as taking into account the approaches and strategies of rural development, the optimal approach for development planning In rural areas of the country, the solution of creating a legislative level is proposed.
تبلیغات
