بازاندیشی فرم و مفهوم در نقوش بازنمایانهٔ موجودات ذی روح کاشی های حرم امام رضا(ع) در عصر صفوی، با تأکید بر رواق گنبد الله وردیخان (مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
درجه علمی: نشریه علمی (وزارت علوم)
آرشیو
چکیده
حرم مطهر رضوی یکی از مهم ترین مکان های مذهبی در جهان تشیع و ترکیب بی نظیری از هنرنمایی معماران و صنعتگران ادوار مختلف هنر ایران زمین است. چرایی حضور نقوش بازنمایانهٔ موجودات ذی روح در تزئیناتِ کاشی کاری موجود در آستان قدس رضوی و به ویژه تصویر بیش از 450 جانور نقش بسته بر رواق گنبد الله وردیخان در عصر صفوی، به رغم محظورات فقهی طرح شده در منابع مکتوب و دیدگاه های عُرفی آن روزگار، مسئلهٔ اصلی این تحقیق است. پژوهش حاضر به روش توصیفی تحلیلی صورت گرفته و داده ها به شیوهٔ کتابخانه ای و مشاهدات میدانی گردآوری شده اند. در انجام پژوهش ضمن مطالعات تاریخی، نمونه ها به شیوهٔ تطبیقی نیز موردبررسی و تحلیل قرار گرفته اند. جامعهٔ آماری مورد پژوهش، تمام نقش مایه های موجود بر کاشی های صحن عتیق و رواق گنبد الله وردیخان از دورهٔ صفوی است؛ هم چنین برای انجام این تحقیق، پنج نسخه از کتاب عجایب المخلوقات و غرائب الموجودات اثر محمد زکریای قزوینی، مربوط به سده های نهم و دهم ه.ق نیز موردتوجه قرار گرفته اند. گمان می رود نقوش کاشی کاری های رواق و تصاویر نسخه های عجایب المخلوقات، به دلیل سابقهٔ تشیع زکریای قزوینی و سویهٔ آموزشی مطالب این کتاب و هم چنین علایق مذهبی الله وردیخان و سابقهٔ مسیحیت و رویکردهای شمایل گرایانهٔ او قابل تطبیق و مقایسه هستند. تفاوت محتوایی کتیبه های نوشته شده بر کاشی های رواق نیز که کارکردی آموزشی و مشابه شمایل های کلیساهای شرقی دارد، بر امکان این مقایسه می افزاید. با توجه به این شباهت ها و البته اهمیت جایگاه مذهبی حرم مطهر رضوی و بناهای پیرامونی آن در اعتقادات مذهبی شیعیان عصر صفوی، نویسندگان معتقدند بانی و سایر دست اندرکاران تزئین این بنا، با هدف تأمین توأمان دیدگاه های مذهبی و دیدگاه عوام، از نقوش به تصویر کشیده شده در نسخه های عجایب المخلوقات استفاده کرده اند.A Revision of Forms and Concepts in the Representation of Figural Motifs in Imam Reza's Shrine in the Safavid Era with an Emphasis on the Allahverdi Khan Dome Portico
Introduction
The Holy Shrine of Razavi is one of the most important religious places in the world of Shia and a unique combination of architects and artisans from different periods of Iranian art. Islamic art has always been in conflict with the figural representation, especially in the realm of religious arts.This research aims to investigate the reason for the presence of figural representation in the tile decorations in the threshold of Razavi's holy shrine, especially the image of more than 450 painted animals on the portico of Allahverdi Khan dome in the Safavid era, despite the legal prohibitions found in jurisprudence books and viewpoints.
Research Method
This paper has adopted a descriptive-analytical method. It has been carried out through library study and field observations along with historical studies in a comparative way. The findings have been examined and analyzed. Statistical domain in this study includes all 486 figural motifs represented in the tiles of the Allahverdi Khan Dome portico, and the figures of five selected Manuscripts of Aja'ib al-Makhluqat and Ghara'ib al-Mawjudat, a book by Mohammad Zakaria Qazvini that was illustrated in the 9th, 10th, and 11th centuries AH. such as Princeton university library Manuscript writen on 865 AD, Chester Beatty's Dublin Library Manuscript written on 952 AD, the Manuscript in Cambridge University Library writen on 974 A.H., the Library Manuscript of Manchester University written on 1040 A.H., and the Manuscript of Harvard University written on 1055 A.H.
Research Findings
The figural motifs representation on the portico tiles of Allahverdi Khan Dome was not similar to any animal decorations of other religious buildings in terms of the number and variety of motifs. The juxtaposition of mythological creatures such as dragons and Simorgh with birds such as peacocks, parrots, and pheasants, which cannot appearantly be compared with religious concepts, indicated the need for further investigation to discover the possible reasons of their occurrence.The studies carried out on the jurisprudential views and opinions of powerful and influential scholars of the Safavid era, such as Mohaghegh Karki and Sheikh Baha'i, indicated that they emphasized the abhorrence of decorating the place of pray (Allahverdi Khan Dome porch as a building adjacent to Hazrat Reza's tomb was the place to pray) with plant motifs, being another figural motif forbidden for representation. The significant difference in the number of animal images and motifs in the decoration of the portico, compared with other buildings of the holy shrine, indicated the lack of prevalence of such subjects in the decoration of religious buildings of the Safavid era. Due to the numerous visual and content commonalities, among these images and the illustrations of different versions of Aja'ib al-Makhluqat and Ghara'ib al-Mawjudat, it seemed that the selection and the use of these images and motifs were formed in a completely conscious manner. Zakariya Qazvini is a Shia historian and geographer who visited Ibn Arabi and was influenced by his belief of unity of existence. The late Agha Bozorg Tehrani considered him Shia in his book, Al-Zariya.The book of Aja'ib al-Makhluqat and Ghara'ib al-Mawjudat is known as an educational and encyclopedic text about creation and various creatures. The most important purpose of its writing could be the attention it could drew from the audience towards the essence of God. Another point is, Allahverdi Khan's devotion to Mulla Sadra, who himself was one of the philosophers believing in the unity of existence. The association of the previous topics with Christianity and iconographyic thought of Allahverdi Khan, as a new Muslim with Armenian background, along with the differences in the implications of the inscriptions written on the tiles of the portico of Allahverdi Khan's dome remind one of its functional similarity with the religious icons in the church. In comparison with other religious buildings and even the adjacent porticoes in The Holy Shrine, this building has a different content and is education-oriented.
Conclusion
Among all the religious buildings of the Safavid era, including mosques, imamzadehs, monasteries, and tombs, there are few buildings that can be compared with the Allahverdi Khan portico in terms of the amount of use of figural motifs. According to existing similarity and the religious position of Razavi Holy Shrine and buildings in the religious beliefs of the Shiaes in the Safavid era, it seems that architects and others involved in the construction and decoration of the Allahverdi Khan portico have made a conscious effort with the aim of the mitigation of the possible objections of religious men and ordinary people to the figural motifs represented on the building. To gain the satisfaction of Allahverdi Khan, as the founder and orderer of the portico, they used images from the characters and images in books such as Ajaib al-Makhluqat va Ghareeb Al-Mawatyat.