آراء السید محمد باقر الصدر فی الدلاله المجازیه (مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
درجه علمی: نشریه علمی (وزارت علوم)
آرشیو
چکیده
للدلاله المجازیه أهمیه بالغه فی تحدید معنى النص الذی وردت فیه وذلک عندما تتضافر مجموعه من القرائن المتصله فی ضبط تلک الدلاله فیتعدد المعنى حسب ما یقتضیه السیاق ومنه فهم النص. یرى اللغویون أن لکلّ لفظ من الألفاظ دلاله (مرکزیه)، وهی القدر المشترک من المعنى الذی یتفق حوله جمیع الناس، والذی یسجل فی المعجم فیطلق علیه المعنى المعجمی، وله بجانب ذلک دلاله أو دلالات هامشیه، وتلک الدلالات تختلف باختلاف الأفراد والثقافات والعصور، والدلاله المجازیه عندهم هی استعمال دلالاتها الهامشیه. والمجاز یعد وسیله فنیه لإثراء الدلاله وتحقیق القوه التعبیریه على مستوى الترکیب وهو من أحسن الوسائل البیانیه التی تهدی إلیها الطبیعه لإیضاح المعنى ولما فیه من الدقه فی التعبیر، فیحصل للنفس به سرور وأریحیه. والأدیب یستخدم الدلالات المجازیه لیعبر عن الألفاظ. یستهدف هذا البحث دراسه الدلاله المجازیه فی آراء السید محمد باقر الصدر (ره) من خلال آثاره. تکمن أهمیه البحث فی رؤیه السید محمد باقر الصدر (ره) للدلاله المجازیه وآراء بعض العلماء. ویعالج البحث علاقه علم الأصول بعلم اللغه ورأی الشهید الصدر عن الحقیقه والمجاز حیث اعتمد البحث على المنهج الوصفی التحلیلی. تشیر النتیجه إلى أنّ فی بحث (المجاز) ناقش الصدر رأی السکاکی فوجّه نقده إلى الفکره الأساس فی ذلک الرأی وهی فکره (الادعاء) محاولاً تفنیدها من خلال افتراضه مرجعین إثنین تحتملهما فکره (الادعاء) عند السکاکی، استعرضهما الصدر ثم بیّن نقاط الضعف والخطأ فیهما لیخرج-بالنتیجه- إلى إنکار مدعى السکاکی وفکرته فی المجاز التی بیّنت الدراسه بأنه بناها على أفکار السابقین له من أئمه البلاغه- وبالخصوص- الإمام الجرجانی. وبّینت الدراسه رأی الصدر فی تفسیر منشأ الدلاله المجازیه، إذ یرى أن اللفظ یکتسب صلاحیه الدلاله على المعنیین (الحقیقی والمجازی) من أوّل وضعه، إلا أن دلالته على المجاز تکون بدرجه أقلّ وأضعف من دلالته على المعنى الحقیقی؛ لأن المدلول المجازی ناشیء من مجموع اقترانین (إقتران باللفظ واقتران بالمعنى الحقیقی)، فضلاً عن حاجه المجاز إلى القرینه الصارفه، تلک القرینه التی یبحث فی مزایاها وإبراز وظائفها.The metaphorical significance in the views of Sayyed Muhammad Baqir al-Sadr
The metaphor's significance is extremely important in determining the meaning of the text which was mentioned, when a group of clues related to controlling that significance joins the meaning of the meaning according to what is required by the context, including understanding the text. Linguists believe that each word has a (central) significance, which is the common amount of the meaning that all people agree on, which is recorded in the dictionary. The lexical meaning is called, and besides this is a sign or marginal connotations, and those connotations differ in different individuals, cultures, ages, and symbolic significance They have - the use of its marginal connotations. The metaphor is an artistic way to enrich the significance and achieve expressive strength at the level of composition, and it is one of the best graphic means by which nature is guided to clarify the meaning because of the accuracy of the expression, so it gets the soul with pleasure and comfort. The writer uses metaphorical connotations to express words. This research aims to study the metaphorical significance of the opinions of Mr. Muhammad Baqir al-Sadr through its effects. The importance of research in the vision of Mr. Muhammad Baqir al-Sadr lies in the metaphor and the opinions of some scholars. The research addresses the relationship of originology with language science and the opinion of the martyr Al-Sadr about the truth and the metaphor, Where the research relied on the descriptive analytical approach. The result indicates that in the research (Metaphor), Al-Sadr discussed the opinion of Sakaki, and he directed his criticism to the basic idea of that opinion, which is the idea of (the prosecution), trying to refute it through his assumption, two references to the idea of (the prosecution) at Sakaki. - As a result- of the denial of the Sukaki Prosecutor and his idea in the metaphor, the study showed that he built on the ideas of his former imams of rhetoric- and in particular- Imam Al-Jarjani. The study indicated Al-Sadr's opinion on the interpretation of the origin of the metaphor, as it sees that the word acquires the validity of the significance of the (real and the metaphor) from the first place, but its indication of metaphor is a lesser and weaker than its significance to the true meaning. key words: truth, metaphor, principles, Muhammad Baqir al-Sadr, opinions. 1.Introduction The linguistic and rhetorical lesson knew patterns of studying truth and metaphor, and many ancients came to acknowledge the existence of true significance, and the metaphorical methods that branch out from it. What we seek - here - is to clarify the aspects of the linguistic lesson in metaphor as one of the main ways of conveying meaning, and the metaphorical significance is of great importance in determining the meaning of the text in which it appears. This is when a group of related clues combine to control that significance, so the meaning multiplies as required by the context and from it. Understanding the text. Linguists believe that each word has a (central) meaning, which is the common amount of meaning around which all people agree, and which is recorded in the dictionary and is called the lexical meaning. In addition to that, it has a marginal meaning or connotations, and these connotations differ according to individuals, cultures, and eras, and the metaphorical meaning. -For them - it is the use of its marginal connotations. Metaphor is an artistic means to enrich meaning and achieve expressive power at the level of composition. Materials & methods studying metaphor is one of the best illustrative means that nature guides us to clarify meaning and because of its accuracy in expression, so the soul gets pleasure and comfort through it. The writer uses metaphorical connotations to express words. This is a study of the linguistic efforts of one of the most important modern figures in the field of jurisprudence and its sources. He is Ayatollah Say
تبلیغات
