statistical analysis

The digital era has introduced mental health challenges, especially for youth. Despite increasing awareness, comprehensive analyses of these challenges remain limited. This study collects and examines the prevalence of 15 key mental health challenges related to digital engagement, based on a sample of 555 participants. The prevalence of these challenges varied, with pressures related to parenting, hoarding, and inappropriate content being the most common, affecting 60.13%, 52.76%, and 45.39% of the participants, respectively. The research also highlights gender and age differences, noting that males report higher levels of issues like FOMO and Nomophobia compared to females. Adults (18+) face more severe challenges, such as memory decline, while younger individuals report fewer problems. Correlation analysis revealed significant relationships between several mental health challenges, such as Nomophobia and TAD (r = 0.68) and FOMO and TAD (r = 0.50), indicating that individuals experiencing one challenge are likely to face others. A decision tree analysis was used to predict mental health challenges by examining the relationships between different mental health conditions, uncovering specific patterns and rules associated with the occurrence of these challenges. Additionally, cluster analysis in this study identified distinct population segments, with 21% of individuals falling into a cluster that experiences severe mental health challenges. The findings suggest that a significant portion of the population is at risk for severe mental health issues, highlighting the need for targeted interventions.

One of the fallacies raised by some critics, especially orientalists, is that the Prophet of Islam's behavior underwent a fundamental change from the Meccan to the Medinan period. They claim that his messages in the Meccan period were peaceful and mercy-oriented, but in the Medinan period, upon gaining power, he adopted a violent approach, and this is evident in the Meccan and Medinan surahs. To investigate this issue, a statistical study was conducted comparing the frequency of concepts related to violence and mercy in the Meccan and Medinan surahs of the Quran. The phrases related to mercy and violence were scored, and then the obtained values were normalized for analysis. The results show that the values for violence-based concepts are (0.20) in the Meccan surahs and (0.19) in the Medinan surahs. Furthermore, the concepts related to mercy are (0.24) in the Medinan surahs and (0.21) in the Meccan surahs. These findings indicate that the raised claim is not only unverifiable but that during the Medinan period, which was a time of establishing and expanding the government, a greater emphasis on mercy is observed. The content differences between the Meccan and Medinan surahs are attributed to the historical and social circumstances of each period. These results highlight the need for a re-evaluation of such interpretations and for attention to statistical methods for the analysis of religious and historical concepts.