مطالب مرتبط با کلیدواژه

Ptolemy


۱.

Planetary Retrograde Motion in a Treatise Attributed to Muʾayyad al-Dīn al-ʿUrḍī(مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)

نویسنده:
تعداد بازدید : ۲۸۵ تعداد دانلود : ۲۰۹
accepted: 15/03/2021) Abstract Planets occasionally quit their prograde motions and go against their normal direction, said retrogression. Happening for differences in orbital velocities of planets and earth, retrogression loops not only are unequal at forms and scales but appear everywhere in the sky. Applying the concentric epicycle-deferent model makes the similar regular loops, but it does not correspond to observations; thus, employing eccentre deferent is needed. Description of the phenomenon is the subject of Book XII of the Almagest. Ptolemy explained some necessary lemmas for his geometrical explanations and examined his justifications by few specified positions for every planet. This paper studies contents of a treatise note on retrogression attributed to Muʾayyad al‐Dīn al‐ʿUrḍī, one of the invited scholars to founding Maragha observatory. Apart from his skills and achievements in designing and manufacturing astronomical instruments, he was a proficient theorist astronomer with educational experiences. The present treatise is an informative text similar to other known works of ʿUrḍī in precision and consideration of the matter’s geometrical aspects.He has attempted to encounter the phenomenon holistically instead of checking parameters in the case studies to present regulation using Apollonius’ theorem
۲.

What do we talk about when we talk about premodern science?(مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)

نویسنده:
تعداد بازدید : ۲۷۰ تعداد دانلود : ۱۴۵
Although Shapin in his book claims a freedom from anachronism, it is not without anachronistic orientations. He cannot hesitate, at least occasionally, to represent the sciences of the Middle Ages as teleological, mythic, non-experimental, non-mechanical knowledge and strongly under the influence of the religious discourses. It seems he is not able to hesitate about a comparison between modern mechanical science and ancient sciences. This comparison, I believe, usually leads to underestimate the premodern sciences, at least for the young readers. In some places, Shapin follows a completely partial approach. He presents the rivals of the modern science in seventeenth century as a vulgar knowledge, which leads the reads to see no difference between ancient sciences and the vulgar knowledge of the nature. Although Shapin is aware of the rhetoric of those times, he never tries to represent a pure image of the scientific-mathematical knowledge of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries