مطالب مرتبط با کلیدواژه
۱.
۲.
۳.
۴.
۵.
۶.
۷.
Paradigm
حوزه های تخصصی:
The concept of value is of great importance for investors. The goal of different groups of investors is always to maximize the value of their capital. The aim of this research is developing factors effective on securities in capital market in order to develop a paradigm for fair valuation that leads investors to make better decisions. To study fair value in a precise and comprehensive way, effective variables are divided into three main categories. First: evaluation variables including cash flow (income quality), discount rate, and earnings per share; second: intra-organizational variables of corporate governance including the type of ownership (the number of institutional investors), management quality (the number of boards in charge or centralized management as well as the number of non-in charge board of directors or decentralized management), the amount of reward, compensation and quality of organizational structure; third: variables relating to reporting quality such as offering reliable and on time information. Other variables such as firm size and operation cycle (complexity of business environment) have also been studied. And according to selected sample, methods and statistical analysis, a paradigm for fair valuation has been developed.
Futurology of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Techniques Using Philosophical Assumptions of Paradigms in Scenario Writing(مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
منبع:
Journal of System Management, Volume ۶, Issue ۳, Autumn ۲۰۲۰
139 - 168
حوزه های تخصصی:
There are many opportunities and threats in the decision-making environment for managers, and an organization must use research and information systems to change, monitor, and anticipate this environment. Futurism reflects how tomorrow reality gives birth to tomorrow's reality is. The purpose of this research; Analyzing the role of futures studies in the existing patterns of critical factors of multi-criteria decision-making techniques in operations research using the philosophical assumptions of the classical and critical paradigms and finally determining the appropriate strategy based on these components, to increase success and life expectancy. The present study intends to formulate exploratory scenarios of this knowledge by using the critical uncertainty approach. To develop credible scenarios of knowledge of decision techniques, the opinions of 15 experts in this field were collected using the fuzzy Delphi approach and through the critical uncertainty questionnaire. After extracting the most important uncertainties, plausible scenarios of decision-making techniques were determined with the help of experts. According to the results obtained from the opinion of experts from the critical uncertainty questionnaire, four research uncertainties were identified, identified and the scenario design criteria were used. Each of the four cases, which includes low attention to social issues versus high attention to social issues, low attention to ethical models versus high attention to ethical models, low attention to soft approaches versus high attention to soft approaches, Low attention to complex issues versus high attention to complex issues indicates a specific dual situation in the future. Each of these dual situations indicates uncertainty about the future of multi-criteria decision making. Based on these uncertainties, three scenarios were identified. These scenarios include Achilles heel, phoenix, and heel. Also, semi-structured interviews with the theme analysis approach were used, and the philosophy of past and future approaches in this field was reviewed and critiqued.
The Impact of the Principles of Islamic Thought on the View of International Relations: From Dominant Paradigm Critique to Alternative Presentation Capacities(مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
حوزه های تخصصی:
With the help of Islamic principles, it is possible to critique the mainstream and the dominant paradigm in International Relations. Still, the capability of the Islamic tenets is higher and does not remain at the level of rejection and criticism. Instead, it can provide alternatives by having specific ontological, anthropological, and epistemological foundations. The present study enumerates theoretical foundations and assumptions of the dominant paradigm in international relations. It describes four critical perspectives and then refers to a distinct view in the Islamic approach. After that, address this fundamental question: 'where is the turning-point of this approach for alternative presentation and construction of an alternative order in International Relation?’ The results indicated that according to the Meta-theoretical foundations of the dominant paradigm, they had created contradictory concepts. They are including material/meaning, nature/metaphysics, and reality/truth but by prioritizing truth (over material objectivity), those dualities become invalid and new dualities are drawn, such as the weak / the arrogant, which can design an alternative to the current dominant system. According to these principles, the effects of originality on the necessity and the priority of creature on nature is emphasized, and truth-seeking generally replaces materialism.
Public Welfare Governance Model with Social Justice Development Approach of Ministry of Cooperatives, Labor and Social Welfare(مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
حوزه های تخصصی:
Purpose: The overall purpose of this study was to determine the public welfare governance model with the social justice development approach of the Ministry of Cooperatives, Labor and Social Welfare. This research was a kind of grounded-applied study. Methodology: The research method is mixed and applied in terms of purpose and descriptive and correlational in terms of how to collect information. Data collection tools were semi-structured interviews and fifteen experts familiar with the topics were interviewed in order to collect data via using purposive sampling method. The statistical population included all employees of the Ministry of Cooperatives, Labor and Welfare of East-Azarbaijan province, which is equal to 98 people. The sampling method was stratified relative and the sample size was 80 people. Findings: Eighteen categories were obtained by classifying 322 key concepts, which were placed in the form of 7 main categories such as participation, accountability, efficiency and effectiveness, approval and rule of law, managers' responsibility, transparency and justice. Conclusion: In the para-permanent model of fighting corruption and central justice of the above category, transparency and fighting corruption of the underlying category, accountability and responsibility of the environmental category, participation and involvement of organizations in governing the strategic category and effectiveness and efficiency, the consequence category and the results are a model of public welfare governance.
Planning for Sustainable Tourism: An Alternative Paradigm(مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
منبع:
International journal of Tourism, Culture and Spirituality, Volume ۱, Issue ۱, December ۲۰۱۶
28 - 43
حوزه های تخصصی:
This paper highlights key characteristics of the current mindset identified as responsible for increasing costs (private and public) associated with tourism industry expansion globally. It then identifies common elements of an alternative paradigm, contrasting its features with those of the established paradigm. It then identifies the implications of the new mindset for the attitudes and behaviour of major stakeholders in tourism-government/destination management organisations, operators, and tourists, as well as researchers. Unless a good proportion of individuals in each of these stakeholder groups change their attitudes and behaviour, no paradigm shift will succeed and the ‘business as usual’ scenario for tourism will prevail, along with its increasing social costs. The paper concludes by addressing the implications for behaviour by different groups of stakeholders.
What is the Futurological Understanding of the Revelatory Text? A Look at Presuppositions about the Concept of the Future(مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
حوزه های تخصصی:
In the field of futurology research in the revelatory texts, various research works have been done in academic centers. What has been paid less attention in these researches is dealing with the presuppositions that should be taken into consideration. The futurological understanding of the revelatory text, as its name suggests, is based on the three pillars of the quiddity of understanding, the quiddity of future, and the quiddity of the revelatory text. In other words, depending on what understanding and perception we have of the phenomenon of understanding itself, what perception and imagination we have of the future, and how we consider the revelatory text as a text and what we should expect from it, makes our futurological understanding different. In this regard, in the first part of the article, an attempt is made to address the point that the researches that have been carried out in the futurological field are based on what perception and expectation of the Holy Qur'an and how this perception and expectation can be used in futurological studies. In the next section, we are focused on the concept of the future and how the understanding of the future that emerges in different paradigms affects the futurological understanding of the revelatory text. In the next section, we are focused on the concept of the future and how the understanding of the future that emerges in different paradigms affects the futurist's understanding of the revelatory text. This study shows that the concept of the future has been moving from something objective, rigid and external to something subjective and rooted in people's beliefs today.
پارادایم پیشرفت و بایسته های اجرایی آن(مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
منبع:
آمایش سیاسی فضا دوره ۶ بهار ۱۴۰۳ شماره ۲ (پیاپی ۲۲)
63 - 75
حوزه های تخصصی:
تحول اجتماعی و ویرایش متن جوامع، بدون داشتن اهداف خاص آن هم در سپهری معنایی که اصطلاحا بدان پارادایم گفته می شود امکان پذیر نمی نماید ولی اجرای هر پارادایمی مستلزم شکل گیری زیر نظام هایی است تا حصول هدف های آن در چهارچوبی مدیریت شود. پارادایم "پیشرفت" که حاصل تامل ایرانیان در مواجه با پارادیم "توسعه" و تلاش محققان ایران در یک قرن اخیر است، رفته رفته به درجه ای از بلوغ میل کرده که زمان فراهم آوردن زمینه های اجرای آن را طلب می کند. بدون تردید هر پارادایمی دارای ریشه های معرفتی، خاستگاه، دکترین و اهداف خاصی است و تحقق آن محتاج شکل گیری سه نظام حکمرانی، علمی، فلسفی و فرهنگی است. پارادایم "پیشرفت" را باید زبان ناملموس رفتاری انقلاب جامعه ایرانیان تفسیر و تدوین این زبان رفتاری را به سندی راهبردی، حاصل کار محققان ایران در الگوی اسلامی ایرانی پیشرفت دانست. نتایح حاصل از فرایند طی شده در اندیشکده آمایش بنیادین که براساس روش تحلیل ژانت صورت گرفته نشان می دهد که:
* پارادایم پیشرفت تلاشی در تدوین آرمان های انقلاب ایران در قالب سندی راهبردی است.
* پارادایم پیشرفت در اجرا مستلزم ایجاد سه زیر "نظام علمی – فلسفی"، "حکمرانی" و "نظام فرهنگی" است.
*پارادایم پیشرفت براساس پنج اصل یعنی تعادل فضایی، راستی و درستی، زیست پذیری و تاب آوری سرزمینی، هویت مکانی و جمهور به دنبال دستیابی به فراورش مدنی است.
*محققان ایرانی در تالیف و تدوین شاخص ها واستاندارهای هر یک از این اصول باید همتی جدی مبذول دارند تا به توان میزان تحقق هریک از اهداف را درمقاطع زمانی ارزیابی نمود.