رحمان صحراگرد

This investigation set out to look into the issue of teachers’ exercise of agency in the Iranian EFL context. More specifically, as part of a larger study, it reports on the ways two Iranian Ministry of Education teachers make sense of and operate in the country’s educational setting under the demands of a centralist system of education. Priestley, Biesta, & Robinson’s (2013) framework of teacher agency formed the conceptual backbone of the present study as well as guiding the data collection/analysis of the study. Qualitative data, from semi-structured interviews as well as follow-up data collection procedures, were gleaned from the participants over the course of an academic year and were subjected to analytical interpretation in the light of the said framework. The researchers came up with findings which, in the main, gave more weight to the well-roundedness of Priestly, Biesta, & Robinson’s model of teacher agency. The results also pointed to the highly situated nature of teacher responsiveness and action, thereby undermining the still prevalent views of the essentialist and idealized character of (teacher) agency. The results of the study are liable to be of use, among others, to case-based teacher education programs.

The main objective of this study was to investigate how Iranian EFL learners used their literacy practices and multimodal resources to mediate interpretation and representation of an advertisement text and construct their understanding of it. Fifteen female adolescents at an intermediate level of proficiency read the ""مبلمان برلیان"" (“Brelian Furniture”) advertisement text and re-created their understandings in pictures and sentences. The data was analyzed based on Kress and Van Leeuwen’s (1996, 2001) theory of social semiotics. The findings suggest that students situated the meanings of the advertisement texts in specific contexts that reflected their own social and cultural experiences. Furthermore, the students demonstrated that the use of multimodal resources had the potential to enhance language and literacy learning in a way that was transformative and was affected by their identities. In addition, the use of multimodal/multiliteracies pedagogy permitted the students to enter into text composition from different paths. Finally, multimodal/multiliteracies pedagogy could foster critical literacy practices by offering EFL students the opportunities to create new identities and challenge discursive practices that marginalize them. The implications of the findings are also discussed

تعلیم و تربیت انتقادی در انگلیسی به عنوان زبان خارجی: اصول، برنامه ریزی، عملکرد لیلا اکبرپور دانشگاه شیراز رحمان صحراگرد دانشگاه شیراز پژوهش حاضر که بخشی از رساله دکتری نویسنده اول می باشد شرح تدوین یک کورس خواندن و درک مفاهیم بر اساس اصول تعلیم و تربیت انتفادی و تاثیر آن کورس بر دانش خواندن فراگیران زبان انگلیسی، انگیزش آن ها برای خواندن متون انگلیسی، چگونگی نگرش دموکراتیک آن ها به کلاس های درس انگلیسی و نیز نگرش آن ها نسبت به کورس پیشنهادی می باشد. در واقع، تحقیق حاضر گامی به سوی بررسی نتایج بر گرفته از مراحل نخستین رساله دکتری ذکر شده است که هدفش تدوین الگویی برای آموزش زبان انگلیسی در ایران بر اساس تعلیم و تربیت انتقادی می باشد. شرکت کنندگان در این پژوهش 61 تن از دانشجویان دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد شیراز (در دو گروه) بودند. 31 نفر از شرکت کنندگان که گروه گواه را تشکیل می دادند بر اساس روش های معمول که در ایران برای آموزش خواندن به کار گرفته می شود و 30 تن دیگر که گروه آزمایشی را تشکیل می دادند بر اساس کورس انتقادی آموزش دیدند. نتایج تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها بر اساس پیش آزمون و پس آزمون خواندن و درک مفاهیم، پرسشنامه انگیزش، پرسشنامه نگرش دموکراتیک و نیزنتایج تحلیل کیفی مصاحبه ها نشان داد که علی رغم مشکلاتی که حین انجام پژوهش در گروه آزمایشی وجود داشت، کورس پیشنهادی بر دانش خواندن شرکت کنندگان، نگرش دموکراتیک آن ها به دروس زبان انگلیسی و ایجاد انگیزه درآنان برای خواندن متون انگلیسی تاثیری مثبت نشان داد. نگرش شرکت کنندگان نسبت به کورس پیشنهادی نیز در قالب چهار تم که از نتایج تحلیل داده های کیفی پدید آمد بررسی شده و گزارش گردید. پیام اصلی این پژوهش کار آمدی اصول تعلیم و تربیت انتقادی در ایران است که برخی پژوهشگران آن ها را در شرایط فعلی غیر کارآمد دانسته اند.

این تحقیق در نظر دارد مجموعه ا ی کتاب های زبان عمومی تالیف شده توسط نویسندگان انگلیسی زبان (4کتاب) و فارسی زبان (5 کتاب) را از حیث اهداف یادگیری در چارچوب اصلاح شده ی بلوم (2011) ارزیابی کند که دریابد کدام سطوح از چارچوب اصلاح شده ی بلوم در این کتابها بارزتر هستند . بدین منظور محتوای کتابها براساس طرح کدگذاری شده که توسط رزمجو و کاظم بور (2012) طراحی شده، کدگذاری شد. پایایی طرح کدگذاری شده نیز مورد آزمایش قرار گرفت. سپس اطلاعات موجود مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت و فراوانی و درصد وقوع اهداف یادگیری متفاوت مورد محاسبه واقع شد. طبق یافته های این تحقیق, برجسته ترین سطوح یادگیری در کتابهای تالیف شده توسط نویسندگان انگلیسی زبان و فارسی زبان، سطوح پایینی مهارتهای اندیشیدن یا همان سه سطح پایینی در چارچوب اصلاح شده ی بلوم می باشند. با این وجود، سطوح بالایی مهارتهای اندیشیدن یا همان سه سطح بالایی در چارچوب اصلاح شده ی بلوم در کتاب های تالیف شده توسط نویسندگان انگلیسی زبان بیشتر دیده میشود . به طور کلی از تحقیق حاضر برمی آید که کتاب های تالیف شده توسط نویسندگان فارسی زبان نمی تواند زبان آموزان را به تفکر انتقادی وادارد. در پایان پیشنهاداتی چند به معلمان و همچنین طراحان کتاب ارایه شده است.

تحقیق حاضر نظریه ویگاتسکی در مورد حوزه رشد تقریبی و استعاره وی در مورد کمک تدریجی و مبانی هویت اجتماعی فرهنگی نورتون را به عنوان اساس نظری استفاده می کند. این تحقیق به بررسی دقیق مکانیسم های کمکی اجتماعی فرهنگی اتخاذ شده در مشارکت های بین دانشجویی و دانشجو و معلم می پردازد. این بررسی تغییرات رفتاری فرهنگی اجتماعی زبان آموزان و همچنین چگونگی شکل گیری هویت اجتماعی فرهنگی آنان از طریق مشارکت در نگارش راهنمایی شده را مورد مطالعه قرار می دهد. برای این منظور معیار درجه بندیلیدز برای تعیین دقیق گفتمان های کمک کننده به هویت فرهنگی اجتماعی استفاده شده است. این گفتمان ها بین 32 دانشجوی سال دوم زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی در دانشگاه شیراز صورت گرفته است که در نگارش گروهی مشارکت کرده اند. تحلیل گفتمان کمکی صورت گرفته در این مشارکت ها اطلاعات مفیدی را در رابطه با چگونکیشکل گیری هویت اجتماعی فرهنگیزبان آموزان آشکار می سازد. نتایج این تحقیق به طور ویژه حاکی از آن است که گفتمان های صورت گرفته بین زبان آموزان و معلم که ازابزارهای زبانی بهره برده انداساسی ترین نقش را در شکل گیری هویتی جدید و رسیدن به استقلال یعنی تکامل هویت اجتماعی فرهنگی ایفامی کند که برخی از این ابزارها عبارتند از: رفتارهای عمدی و هدفمند، توجه مشترک، مشارکت عاطفی، چرخ ارتباطی، واکنش وابسته، رفتار میان-فردی، و استفاده از زبان اول در تکالیف نگارشی مشترک.

In recent years, the line of research on the socio-pragmatic aspects of language and language use has been increasing very rigorously. In this regard, taboos as well as euphemisms, due to their significant role in impacting on the interactions among interlocutors, have been the subject of research in various societies and cultures from a vast variety of aspects. That being so, the present study was an attempt to explore the perceptions of Iranian adult speakers of linguistic taboos and euphemisms in Iranian society. To achieve this aim, a convenient sample of 48 Iranian adult speakers, 24 males and 24 females, from Shiraz, Iran was recruited to participate in the study. The researcher interviewed them one by one and audio recorded their answers for further analysis and to determine their perceptions of linguistic taboos and euphemisms in Iranian society. The findings indicated that: a. Most of the participants believed that sex is the most offensive topic in Iranian society; b. All of the participants believed that people should use euphemisms in their speech and should take after of their speech especially in formal situations; c. Most of the Iranian adult speakers believed that the most important factor which leads to the use of taboo words is anger; and d. Most of the participants, both male and female, said they do not discuss taboo topics in mixed-sex groups.

This study sought to compare Iranian EFL novice and expert teachers regarding their procedural knowledge in Iranian language institutes and universities. A questionnaire was developed based on the literature, the theoretical framework, and the results of a qualitative study. This questionnaire was administered to the whole sample of the study who was 200 Iranian EFL teachers from different genders and educational contexts. The participants were selected conveniently as going through random sampling was not possible. Based on the results of the exploratory factor analysis, seven factors emerged under the main category of procedural knowledge for these teachers. The findings revealed that: (a) Iranian EFL expert teachers have higher levels of procedural knowledge than Iranian EFL novice teachers (b) expert teachers have higher levels of classroom management knowledge, topic management knowledge and students involved in learning knowledge than novice teachers (c) expert teachers have the knowledge to make rapport (good emotional relationship) with their students more easily and effectively than novice teachers (d) there is not a significant difference between Iranian EFL expert teachers and Iranian EFL novice teachers due to knowledge of talk management, knowledge of strategies while teaching and knowledge of teachers’ learning strategies for learners in the classroom.

Flipped learning is an instructional approach that underlines the efficient use of classroom time by shifting the conventional activities of learners and educators in and out of the class. In flipped learning, students' roles as passive listeners change to active participants in classroom activities. The present study was designed to build a model of flipped classroom instruction (FCI) for the general IELTS writing. Additionally, this research intended to examine if there is a meaningful difference between the students’ general IELTS writing scores in the flipped class and those in the conventional class. An FCI model was carefully developed based on the thematic analysis of the previous flipped classroom studies about writing. Then it was operationally explained for a general IELTS writing class. The participants of the study consisted of 100 male and female Iranian EFL learners. Fifty learners were randomly selected to experience FCI and the other fifty learners received conventional classroom instruction. The findings revealed that the learners in the flipped classes, on average, acquired higher scores than the learners in conventional classes.   

In an attempt to liberate teachers from deficiencies of the conventional methods, Kumaravadivelu (1994) proposed the concept of “post method condition” to overcome the challenges caused by the very nature of methods. The literature regarding post-method pedagogy has indicated that most of the studies focus on its theoretical aspect, while the practical realization has been largely untouched. To this end, the present study was an endeavor to unveil the perspective of Iranian EFL teachers concerning the applicability of this pedagogy. 21 male and female in-service EFL teachers from different cities in Iran (Shiraz, Marvdasht, Bushehr, Tehran, and Gonbad-e-Kavus) participated in this qualitative research where data came from semi-structured interviews as the primary source of data collection. The interview data were transcribed and coded using Straus and Corbin’s (1998) constant comparative method, including three codification processes of open, axial and selective codings. The finding indicated that absence of required autonomy among teachers, teacher’s job security, students’ passivity, absence of critical thinking skills among students, dominance of transmission model of teacher education, inefficiency of the textbooks, teacher’s focus on coverage and grade pressure, and demanding nature of post-method pedagogy as the main pedagogical barriers which prevent language teachers from applying this pedagogy in their teaching practices.

The main priority for university translation educators is to improve the quality and outcomes of translation courses. To achieve such a goal, the instructors are required to integrate learners' needs, identified with the help of a needs survey, into syllabus content. Accordingly, the present study was conducted to identify the Iranian English majors' difficulties in translating English texts since once a problem is identified, exploring the best pedagogical solutions would follow. The aim was accomplished through qualitative descriptive research conducted at Islamic Azad University, Shiraz Branch tracing the errors committed by the English majors in their exam papers in academic years 2016-2019. Following the model proposed by Miremadi (2008), the syntactic and lexical problems were identified in the exam papers collected during six semesters. Moreover, three more categories were added to the list as the data analysis moved forward: culture problems, stylistic problems, and miscellaneous errors with detailed subdivisions. What appeared to be worthy of attention in the results was the students' weakness in text and sentence segmentation to find the function of the components to approach textual meaning, resulting from the students' poor English language proficiency. The results also revealed the students' poor topical knowledge as well as the lack of knowledge of translation techniques and strategies.