مطالعه درک و تصور زنان شاغل از تحقیر و راهبردهای آنها در جهت مقابله با آن مورد مطالعه زنان شاغل شهر ماکو (مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
درجه علمی: نشریه علمی (وزارت علوم)
آرشیو
چکیده
تحقیر زنان شاغل در محیط های کاری از جمله آسیب های اجتماعی شایعی است که پیامدهای متعددی می تواند داشته باشد. پژوهش حاضر تلاشی است برای مطالعه درک و تصوران زنان شاغل از تحقیر اجتماعی و راهبردهایی که آنها در مقابل تحقیر اجتماعی اتخاذ می کنند. برای تحلیل این مسئله از روش کیفی (نظریه زمینه ای) استفاده شده است و با بهره گیری از روش نمونه گیری هدف مند با 40 نفر از زنان شاغل شهرستان ماکو مصاحبه نیمه ساخت یافته انجام شده است. برای اعتبار و اعتمادبخشی به داده ها، از قابلیت اعتبار یا اعتبارپذیری، انتقال پذیری، قابلیت اعتماد و قابلیت تأیید استفاده شده است. پس از تحلیل اطلاعات بر اساس مراحل سه گانه کدگذاری (باز، محوری، گزینشی) در خصوص درک و تصور زنان شاغل از تحقیر در مرحله کدگذاری باز، 25 مفهوم یا کد باز استخراج شد و در مرحله کدگذاری محوری پس از بررسی دقیق میان مفاهیم و برقرای پیوند بین مفاهیم، 5 مقوله بدست آمد که نشان دهنده درک و تصور زنان شاغل از تحقیر اجتماعی می باشد. این مقولات عبارتند از: کلیشه های جنسیتی، تبعیض جنسیتی؛ خشونت ؛ بی اعتمادی، و تجاوز به حقوق زنان. با انتزاع و ترکیب 5 مقوله محوری تحقیق در مرحله کدگذاری گزینشی، مقوله هسته نهایی تحت عنوان تحقیر اجتماعی ظهور کرد که تمامی مقولات محوری را تحت پوشش قرار می دهد. همچنین زنان در موقعیت تحقیر با سه واکنش یا راهبرد رو به رو می شوند: پذیرش وضع موجود، مقاومت و بازاندیشی.Studying the Perception of Employed Women of Humiliation and Their Strategies to Deal with it Case study orking Women in Mako City
The humiliation of working women is a widespread social problem that has diverse consequences. This study aims to investigate working women's perceptions of humiliation in the workplace and their strategies for coping with it. To examine this issue, a qualitative approach was employed. Using purposive sampling and in-depth semi-structured interviews, 40 women from both public and private sectors were surveyed in Mako city. To ensure the validity, credibility, reliability, and transferability of the data, various measures were taken. Based on the three coding stages (open, axial, and selective) to explore working women's perceptions of humiliation, we extracted 25 concepts or open codes in the open coding stage. By linking these concepts, we obtained five categories that represent working women's perceptions of social humiliation. These categories include gender stereotypes, gender discrimination, violence, distrust, and violation of women's rights. Through abstracting and integrating these central categories in the selective coding stage, the core category of "social humiliation" was identified, which covers all the main categories. The study also found that women in situations of humiliation resort to three strategies: acceptance, resistance, and reconsideration.
Humiliation, Social Humiliation, Employed Women.
Introduction
Many working women have experienced discrimination and various difficulties and harms in the workplace, including humiliation. Yet, the issue of humiliation of working women has not been thoroughly examined from a sociological perspective, and prior evaluations have primarily relied on mental perceptions and relatively superficial information. The lack of sociological research on this topic in Iran highlights the insufficient attention paid to the situation of employed women. Therefore, the aim of this study is to address the following questions: What specific examples do women provide regarding their experiences of humiliation, and what strategies do they employ to cope with it?
Methodology
The research utilized a qualitative method, employing the semi-structured in-depth interview technique to collect data. The sample group consisted of employed women in Mako city, chosen through a purposive sampling method. A total of 40 women working in both public and private sectors in Mako city were interviewed until data saturation was reached.
Result
Upon analyzing the collected data using the three coding stages (open, axial, selective), 25 open codes were identified during the open coding stage. Through linking the concepts, five categories were developed indicating working women's perceptions of humiliation. These categories were: gender stereotypes, gender discrimination, violence, distrust, and violation of women's rights. Through abstraction and integration of these five central categories during the selective coding stage, the final core category emerged as "social humiliation," encompassing all of the central categories. Based on participant responses, women adopt three strategies when confronted with humiliating situations: acceptance, resistance, and reconsideration.
References
Anderson, J. W. (1989). A comparison of Arab and American conceptions of “effective”; Persuasion. Howard Journal of Communications, 2(1), 81-96.
Burton, P., Phipps, S. & Curtis, L. (2002). All in the family: A simultaneous model of parenting style and child conduct. American Economic Review, 92(2), 368-372.
Czarniawska, B. (2008). Humiliation: A standard organizational product?. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19(7), 1034-1053.
Darvishfar, A., Jask, M. & Faizipour, K. (2015). Employed women’s experience working in manufacturing workshops. Juornal of A Research Journal on Social Work, 2(5), 77-108. (In Persian)
Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Fangen, K. (2006). Humiliation experienced by Somali refugees in Norway. Journal of Refugee Studies, 19(1), 69-93.
Flick, U. (2018). Doing Grounded Theory (Vol. 9). Sage.
Giddens, A. & Birdsall, K. (2006). Sociology. Polity Press.
Golabi, F., Alizadeh Aghdam, M. &Zarezadeh Ardashir, L. (2018). Parenting style and feelings of humiliation, the study of women over 15 years of age living in 10 areas in Tabriz. Journal of Woman in Culture Arts, 10(3), 351-380. (In Persian)
Hartling, L. M., Lindner, E., Spalthoff, U. & Britton, M. (2013). Humiliation: a nuclear bomb of emotions?. Psicología Política.
Hartling, L. M. & Luchetta, T. (1999). Humiliation: Assessing the impact of derision, degradation, and debasement. Journal of Primary Prevention, 19(4), 259-278.
Hosseini, S. & Dashti, M. (2012). A Study of gender stereotypes in the Iranian literature: The case of Al-e-Ahmad's fictions. Global Media Journal-Persian Edition, 7(1), 64-27. (In Persian)
Husum, T. L., Thorvarsdottir, V., Aasland, O. & Pedersen, R. (2020). It comes with the territory’-Staff experience with violation and humiliation in mental health Care-A mixed method study. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 71, 101610.
Javid, M. & Shahmoradi, E. (2013). Working women issues: A case study of women working in judicial systems. Women's Strategic Studies, 15(60), 73-110. (In Persian)
Jogdand, Y., Khan, S. & Reicher, S. (2020). The context, content, and claims of humiliation in response to collective victimhood. The Social Psychology of Collective Victimhood, 77.
Klein, D. C. (1991). The humiliation dynamic: Viewing the task of prevention from a new perspective, special issue. Journal of Primary Prevention, Part I, 12(2).
Kozusżnik, B. (2017). Humiliation: Why we deserve respect at work. An Introduction to Work and Organizational Psychology: An International Perspective, 498-505.
Lindner, E. (2006). Making Enemies: Humiliation and international conflict. Praeger Security International.
Lindner, E. G. (2001). Humiliation and human rights: Mapping a minefield. Human Rights Review, 2(2), 46-46.
Mansour, M. (2016). Feeling Inferior. University of Tehran Press. (In Persian)
Najafi, F., Fallahi-Khoshknab, M., Dalvandi, A., Ahmadi, F. & Rahgozar, M. (2014). Workplace violence against Iranian nurses: A systematic review. Journal of Health Promotion Management, 3(2), 72-85. (In Persian)
Rahmani, F., Ebrahimi, H. & Asghari, E. (2015). Workplace violence, its determinants and reaction toward it perceived by nurses working in psychiatric wards: A cross-sectional study. Iran Journal of Nursing, 28(97), 1-10.
Sadaghi Fasaee, S. & Nikdel, N. (2016). Gender-related analysis of social humiliation in inter-individual relationships: A qualitative study. Women Studies, 7(15), 99-125. (In Persian)
Sadeghi Fassaei, S. & Nikdel, N. (2015). Qualitative study of agents perception on social humiliation. Journal of Applied Sociology, 26(2), 41-58. (In Persian)
Seguino, S. (2000). Gender inequality and economic growth: A cross-country analysis. World Development, 28(7), 1211-1230.
Shalchi, S. & Gholizadeh, S. (2018). Experience of social exclusion of women in informal settlements (Case study: Islamabad neighborhood of Tehran). Urban Sociological Studies, 8(27), 143-174. (In Persian)
Sharbatian, M. H., Danesh, P. & Tavafi, P. (2017). Sociological analysis of domestic violence against women and its impact on the sense of security (Case study 18 women 54 years in Miyaneh). Strategic Rssearch on Social Problems in Iran University of Isfahan, 6(1), 47-72. (In Persian)
Stark, O. & Fan, C. S. (2011). Migration for degrading work as an escape from humiliation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 77(3), 241-247.
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques. Sage.
Torres, W. J. & Bergner, R. M. (2010). Humiliation: Its nature and consequences. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 38(2), 195-204.
تبلیغات
